Certain countries in the world have been chanced by the legions dictators as well as the democratic leading. Pakistan is one of the finest examples of a lot(prenominal) a system. In Pakistan, armed services and democratic administration shift hands time and again and this chain goes on. This is evident from the last(prenominal) experiences. This is similarly evident from current economic crisis of the untaught subsequently a long period of tyranny. It seems that the democratic system is give knocked out(p) for Pakistan. Although the multitude machine plays vital role in the warranter of a country yet it has no affaire to do with the authorities of the country. Politicians and armament police officers have quite different jobs. Politicians are hypothetic to stock the presidency and the force is supposed to provide security measure to the country. As it is evident from history that whenever, military dictators ruled over Pakistan, at the end, everything got me ssed up because of their inability to rule. Although, in their politics, Pakistan flourished in veritable palm notwithstanding at that place were many drawbacks as well. alone(prenominal) military dictator in Pakistan, when he came to rule, initially claimed to lap for the progression of the large number just to keep the gain vigor loyal to him hardly later he became involved in his personal interests. A military dictator is not below the influence of the plurality and he makes his own decisions. On the early(a)wise hand, a political leader comes to power by public balloting and the public chooses him/her from within themselves. If we look at Musharaf?s regime, we atomic number 50 easily discovery out that we end up where we started from. A lot of troubles arose in Musharaf?s regime e.g. load shedding problem, judiciary problem, terrorism, problem of the Lal Masjid, operations in tribal areas and inflation. Also, Pakistan had a very crazy foreign policy. It lonesome(prenominal) emphasized its relatio! ns with the States and much little importance was disposed to other countries. But the States did not support Pakistan when India was blaming us for the Mumbai attacks. Everyone in Pakistan is blaming the current organization for all these problems but no one is blaming the original culprit, the military dictator. Not only Pakistan, there are examples of many countries same(p) Thailand, Indonesia and North Korea in which military dictatorship is said to be creditworthy for spoiling the economy of the country along with other imp meets. Iraq is another example. Ten years of military dictatorship had a devastating effect on the favorable life of the wad of Iraq. Sectarianism is a gift of ibn Talal Hussein to the people of Iraq. It seems that the people of Iraq hate Saddam Hussain the most. So, obviously the military can do better job on the circumference than in politics. This can be well demonstrated with the friend of an example of a physician and a surgeon. If the physician is asked to do a operating room and stock-still if he/she does it correct, he/she will not be called a surgeon. Similar is the slipperiness with military officers in polished jobs. A military officer can not do the job of a complaisant officer properly. Another contingency for Pakistan was the separation of eastward Pakistan. This was in like manner caused by the negligence of a military dictator. The rights of the people of East Pakistan were not protected. Injustice and odd military interference in politics caused their separation from westmost Pakistan. Wars of 1965 and 1971 were also fought during military regimes. at once Pakistan has a very meritless image in the world. peerless might ask who is responsible for this? In the 1980s, General Zia-ul-Haq and America united to create Al Qaeda. It was created solely in the stir of Jihad but without delay it is a sign of terrorism and is a threat for the sovereignty of the country. On the other hand, state is ?Governme nt of the people, by the people, for the people? (Abr! aham capital of Nebraska). As democracy is government of the people i.e.
, people of a country elect leaders from themselves, nobody is worthy of denounce for his/her misdeeds. Blaming them means blaming ourselves because we have select them and they are from us. The democratic rule has proved quite dear for us. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto nationalized the banks, steel mill, Pepco and many other private companies which was a grouping step for the prosperity of the country. He also started the Pakistan atomic Program. The Pakistan Nuclear Program was completed in the era of Nawaz Sharif who made Pakistan the initiatory nuclear power of the Isla mic world. There is also ?Benazir Income class which has been proposed by the government in Public Sector developmental Programme (PSDP) 2008-09 to provide succor to the depressed segment of purchase order in the wake of price-hike. The create by mental act meant purely for the poor initially features Rs. 34 billion that would be increased upto Rs. 50 billion, according to a budgetary document.? (PSDP, 2008-09). This proves that politicians do something for the people. In conclusion as Churchill says ?There is no much(prenominal) thing as the perfect form of government on earth, but any other form of government produces even less desirable results than democracy. Until today, no other form of government has been invented that could dumbfound public affairs better than democracy?. so farther if democratic government is not the perfect form of government, it is go around suited to the situation and the people of Pakistan which is evident from all the discussion. working Cite dPublic Sector Developmental Programme (PSDP) 2008-09! http://www.shiachat.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=234947152Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865)http://www.democracy-building.info/definition-democracy.htmlSir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)http://www.democracy-building.info/definition-democracy.html If you neediness to get a full essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
